JBH . . . the issue was not about human responsibility. Herb Evans
It became that when you mentioned fatalism. -- jbh No, it did not become that; you manipulated and forced it to be that. Calvinists are fatalists irregardless of human responsibility. Herb Evans
Its "regardless" irregardless isn't a word... sorry
Anyway, yes fatalism and human responsibility are opposites. They can't BOTH be in the picture.
Quote:
Again, JBH, the issue was not whether Calvinists evangelize or not. All Calvinists are fatalists. Why invent straw men? Herb
Nothing I said was a straw man. jbh28 When you change the subject and the issue, it is a straw man. Herb Evans
Actually, that is a red herring if I change the subject. A Straw man is when you misrepresent your opponents view. you know, like say P means something it doesn't and then argue against the made up view of P.
Quote:
What makes Calvinists fatalist is their insistence that God planned before man ever existed that only the pre chosen elect could be saved and that others would be damned and that there are some living today that could never have been saved. Herb Evans
Everyone chooses to sin before and after salvation. It is laughable that you should say that they never could have been saved because of them, when you say it was all predetermined. I dont see anywhere that God chooses folks to go to heaven or hell except through repentance and faith. You want to blame the negative destiny on folks but oppose anything that involves the positive destination by them, like repenting and believing. Yes, I know what you believe the non-elect cannot believe or repent but they can sin. Herb Evans
They cannot because they don't want to. You choose based on your desires. EVERY choice you have ever made has been based on what you wanted most at that moment with the options available to you. No man wants to seek Christ. no man can come to Christ without the drawing of God. You can laugh all you want, but it is very biblical what I just said. The Bible is very clear the condition of man before he is saved. The Bible in many times speaks of choosing people to heaven. I have given them to you already.
Quote:
Quote:
this is just plain ignorance. how can all by hyper? Do you not understand what hyper means. Go do some study on what Calvinist believe. JBH 28 Yup! TULIP all inclusive fatalism makes them all inclusive HYPER, whatever meaning you care to assign to it in your ignorance. Herb Evans
Nice comeback.... Was that your best?
Quote:
Hyper Calvinists are those that take the doctrines of Calvinism to an extreme. you can't have "hyper" to all. doesn't make sense. All TULIPS take their doctrine to an extreme. Therefore, they are all hyper. Herb Evans
Again, you are ignorant of what Calvinist believe. Not all take it to an extreme. I gave you an article from a Calvinist demonstrating the difference. But like you always do, you ignore what the Calvinist say they believe. you would rather make up something they do not believe.
Quote:
Yes, things referenced to us are in time. That is why when God said when we are chosen, He put it in time "before the foundation of the world." Jbh28 LOL! There was no time before the foundation of the world onlyeternity. It is only God that inhabited eternity in His every present present with no past or future. Now if you, as GOD, want to inject our past, present, or future into eternity, that is your problem. Herb Evans
You keep ignoring the fact that it says before the foundation of the world. What does that mean? Were you choosen when you got saved? Well, if that is true, then did you get saved before the foundation of the world?
Quote:
Then we have been elect for all eternity. You must do something with "before the foundation of the world." You can't just thought it out the window. Jbh28 Unfortunately, you still do not get it. IN CHRIST! IN CHRIST! -- Herb Evans
I have not ignored in Christ or in Him. You are ignoring the before the foundation of the world. We were chosen in him. This doesn't mean we are already saved. Or already in him, we are chosen before hand in him and will be in him later. Why do you continue to ignore the "before the foundations of the world"?
Quote:
I'm not confusing time an eternity. I was in Christ when I was saved. I was chosen before the foundation of the world. Ephesians 1 clearly teaches that. you cannot remove the time element from the phrase "before the foundation of the world." and then add time back at "in him" to say when election was. "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:" -- JBH 28 You admit the when you were in Christ when you were saved. Therefore you were not IN CHRIST before the foundation of the world (eternity). Therefore, it is you that is removing the in Christ from the chosen in eternity and putting it INTO TIME. You cannot have it both ways. Herb Evans
No, you didn't read what I said. You almost appear to be arguing against the passage and not me.
[quote]
We were chosen in him before the foundation of the world. We are not yet in him till we are saved. You are not saved at election. Jbh28 But it is election IN CHRIST and IN HIM that is found in your proof texts before you were saved or ever born. It does not say chosen before the foundation of the world. Herb Evans
"yes it does, it says we were chosen in him before the foundation of the world. what does the "before the foundation of the world mean"?
Quote:
Ephesians 1:4 says election was before the foundation of the world. John 6:37 "All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out."the giving precedes the coming. -- JBH 28 The giving does precede the coming, but you do not establish what the giving is that takes place or how and when. Herb Evans
Ok good, we agree that that giving precede the coming, which means election takes place before salvation. Jbh28 No, we do not agree on that. Election takes place IN CHRIST after being saved. Herb Evans
So we are chosen in him after being saved....hum so were you saved before the foundation of the world? You see the difference. I have a Bible verse, you have to take out a statement. Where does it say anywhere in Scripture that election happens after we are saved?
Quote:
People is what is being given. How and when is through election before the foundations of the world.-- Jbh28 People did not exist before the foundation of the world, so how could they be given then? God decreed that election would be IN CHRIST, when they were found IN CHRIST. Herb Evans
God knew us before we were born.
Quote:
It does not say chosen to salvation; its says chosen to be holy and unblameable. You are confused about that as well. So, to cop out and say that is what we are supposed to be, then hear this. Being saved is what we are supposed to be. Herb Evans
what else is it talking about then. Paul is talking to Christians. This must be your "cop out" answer. Just pretend it isn't talking about election. You look too busy trying to be a anti-calvinist, that you will ignore Scripture just to be that way.
Keep your short articles by others and write your own. I have been dealing with Calvinists for over 45 years. The first church that I joined after being saved and moved to Florida was a Calvinist church. I wrote for the Baptist Examiner, a Calvinist periodical for many years and read it for more years than that. I know what Calvinists believe. Herb Evans
Look Herb, I'm tired of playing your little game. You do not know what Calvinists really believe. you don't even know what tulip really means. You only know the straw man version of what they believe. You might have been in a Calvinist church, probably by what you have said a hyper calvinist church. Unless you can explain what "before the foundation of the world" means, I'm done dealing with this subject with you. You said we were elected after being saved, while Ephesians 1 says we were elected before. (unless you were born before the foundations of the world.
__________________
II Corinthians 1:20 ESV "For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory."
Jude 24-25 ESV "Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen."
JBH . . . the issue was not about human responsibility. – Herb Evans
It became that when you mentioned fatalism. – jbh28 No, it did not become that; you manipulated and forced it to be that. Calvinists are fatalists irregardless of human responsibility. – Herb Evans
Its "regardless" irregardless isn't a word... sorry – Jbh28 Sorry, but it is a word in the dictionary – “adv [prob. Blend of irrespective and regardless] nonstand: REGARDLESS.” Still if you want to turn an theological argument into an English or spelling argument. Do it with someone else. – Herb Evans
Anyway, yes fatalism and human responsibility are opposites. They can't BOTH be in the picture. –Jbh28 Okay! So, Calvinists are still fatalists. – Herb Evan
Quote:
Again, JBH, the issue was not whether Calvinists evangelize or not. All Calvinists are fatalists. Why invent straw men? – Herb Nothing I said was a straw man. – jbh28 When you change the subject and the issue, it is a straw man. – Herb Evans
Actually, that is a red herring if I change the subject. A Straw man is when you misrepresent your opponents view. you know, like say P means something it doesn't and then argue against the made up view of P. --jbh28 Actually, a straw man is a weak or imaginary opposition (as an argument or adversary). How about a red herring straw man? The “P” in TULIP says “perserverence” and not preservation. – Herb Evans
Quote:
What makes Calvinists fatalist is their insistence that God planned before man ever existed that only the pre chosen elect could be saved and that others would be damned and that there are some living today that could never have been saved. – Herb Evans Of course there are different views even among Calvinists here. I'll just give you my view. Those that you mentioned "could never have been saved" is only because of them. They choose to sin. They choose to reject God. This is what they wanted to do. God elects to heaven not hell. I don't see anywhere in Scripture where God chooses anyone to hell, it is always to heaven. It's not that everybody is on a neutral road and God chooses some to exit to heaven and some to hell. We are all on a road to hell. We are all choosing to sin. God elects some to heaven. – Jbh28 Everyone chooses to sin before and after salvation. It is laughable that you should say that they never could have been saved because of them, when you say it was all predetermined. I don’t see anywhere that God chooses folks to go to heaven or hell except through repentance and faith. You want to blame the negative destiny on folks but oppose anything that involves the positive destination by them, like repenting and believing. Yes, I know what you believe – the non-elect cannot believe or repent but they can sin. – Herb Evans They cannot because they don't want to. You choose based on your desires. EVERY choice you have ever made has been based on what you wanted most at that moment with the options available to you. No man wants to seek Christ. no man can come to Christ without the drawing of God. You can laugh all you want, but it is very biblical what I just said. The Bible is very clear the condition of man before he is saved. The Bible in many times speaks of choosing people to heaven. I have given them to you already.—Jbh28
this is just plain ignorance. how can all by hyper? Do you not understand what hyper means. Go do some study on what Calvinist believe. – JBH 28 At the Moment, I am just interested in what you believe. -- Herb Evans
Quote:
Yup! TULIP all inclusive fatalism makes them all inclusive HYPER, whatever meaning you care to assign to it in “your” ignorance. – Herb Evans
Nice comeback.... Was that your best?– Jbh28 No, stick around for better. – Herb Evans
Hyper Calvinists are those that take the doctrines of Calvinism to an extreme. you can't have "hyper" to all. doesn't make sense. – Jbh28 All TULIPS take their doctrine to an extreme. Therefore, they are all hyper. – Herb Evans
Again, you are ignorant of what Calvinist believe. Not all take it to an extreme. – Jbh28 Again, you are ignorant of what they believe to the extreme and even what you believe to the extreme. – Herb Evans
I gave you an article from a Calvinist demonstrating the difference. But like you always do, you ignore what the Calvinist say they believe. you would rather make up something they do not believe.– Jbh28 I do not ignore what you say, for you are who I am debating and not them. Again, I am not interested in Calvinist propaganda and damage control from others. It is just you and me. If you can’t handle your own arguments without bringing in help – pity you. – Herb Evans
Quote:
Yes, things referenced to us are in time. That is why when God said when we are chosen, He put it in time "before the foundation of the world."– Jbh28
Quote:
LOL! There was no time before the foundation of the world – onlyeternity. It is only God that inhabited eternity in His every present present with no past or future. Now if you, as GOD, want to inject our past, present, or future into eternity, that is your problem. – Herb Evans
You keep ignoring the fact that it says before the foundation of the world. What does that mean? – Jbh28 Before the foundation means eternity as in my previously posted article. – Herb Evans
Were you choosen when you got saved? – Jbh28 Is choosen a word? Yes I was elect and chosen when I was IN CHRIST when I got saved. – Herb Evans
Well, if that is true, then did you get saved before the foundation of the world?– Jbh28 No, I did not get saved before the foundation of the world. Your move! – Herb Evans
Quote:
Then we have been elect for all eternity. You must do something with "before the foundation of the world." You can't just thought it out the window. – Jbh28
Quote:
Unfortunately, you still do not get it. IN CHRIST! IN CHRIST! -- Herb Evans
I have not ignored in Christ or in Him. You are ignoring the before the foundation of the world. We were chosen in him.– Jbh28 You have ignored IN HIM to be holy and blameless. You have ignored IN CHRIST as a pre requisite for that election in eternity and God’s present. – Herb Evans
This doesn't mean we are already saved. – Jbh28 Agreed! – Herb Evans
Or already in him, . . .– Jbh28 Agreed! – Herb Evans
. . . we are chosen before hand in him and will be in him later. – Jbh28 Chosen in Him to be Holy and without blame. – Herb Evans
Why do you continue to ignore the "before the foundations of the world"?– Jbh28 I don’t ignore it, I qualify it with its own qualifier “IN CHRIST.” You are not IN CHRIST in eternity. Still, God has made the determination that those in Christ “LATER” are chosen or elect. No one is chosen or elect that does not exist. – Herb Evans
__________________
And by the holy Scriptures we understand, the Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, as they are now translated into our English Mother-Tongue, of which there never hath been any doubt of their verity, and authority, in the protestant Churches of Christ to this day. --The English Orthodox Baptist Confession of 1679
1. Scriptures in the English mother tongue.
2. Authoritive in the English mother tongue.
3. No doubt as to their verity in the English mother tongue.
I'm not confusing time an eternity. I was in Christ when I was saved. I was chosen before the foundation of the world. Ephesians 1 clearly teaches that. you cannot remove the time element from the phrase "before the foundation of the world." and then add time back at "in him" to say when election was. "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:" -- JBH 28
Quote:
You admit the when you were in Christ when you were saved. Therefore you were not IN CHRIST before the foundation of the world (eternity). Therefore, it is you that is removing the in Christ from the chosen in eternity and putting it INTO TIME. You cannot have it both ways. Herb Evans
No, you didn't read what I said. You almost appear to be arguing against the passage and not me. We were chosen in him before the foundation of the world. We are not yet in him till we are saved. You are not saved at election. Jbh28 No, you did not read what I said. You almost appear to be arguing against the passage and not me. You are elect at salvation IN TIME. Before the foundation of the world happens all at once with God, but you are not God; you are finite and not infinite creature of time. Herb Evans
Quote:
But it is election IN CHRIST and IN HIM that is found in your proof texts before you were saved or ever born. It does not say chosen (note what is missing) before the foundation of the world. Herb Evans
"yes it does, it says we were chosen in him before the foundation of the world. what does the "before the foundation of the world mean"? Jbh28 No, it doesnt! Tit for tat! You kill my dog, Ill kill your cat. It says chosen IN HIM. Before the foundation of the world means eternity as previously said by me. Chosen for what IN HIM to be holy and without blame. That is what you are ignoring. What does that mean? This one of the two verses that you can cite for your view is not yours. Im surprised that you use it as opposed to the other. Herb Evans
Ephesians 1:4 says election was before the foundation of the world. John 6:37 "All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out."the giving precedes the coming. -- JBH 28
Quote:
The giving does precede the coming, but you do not establish what the giving is that takes place or how and when. Herb Evans Ok good, we agree that that giving precede the coming, which means election takes place before salvation. Jbh28 No, we do not agree on that. Election takes place IN CHRIST after being saved. Herb Evans
So we are chosen in him after being saved....hum Jbh28 We are chosen IN HIM after we are IN CHRIST. Herb Evans
so were you saved before the foundation of the world? Jbh28 No! Herb Evans
You see the difference. Jbh28 I see the difference but you do not. Again chosen to what? Not salvation unless IN CHRIST. Herb Evans
I have a Bible verse, you have to take out a statement. Jbh28 You have a Bible verse in which you take out the qualification of holiness and without blame. Herb Evans
Where does it say anywhere in Scripture that election happens after we are saved? Jbh2h The same place that it says that election happens before we are saved. The same place that it says those not elected in eternity are damned. Again, Calvinism is not a Bible doctrine, it is a system of sophistic logic, a philosophy. Herb Evans
Quote:
People is what is being given. How and when is through election before the foundations of the world.-- Jbh28
Quote:
People did not exist before the foundation of the world, so how could they be given then? God decreed that election would be IN CHRIST, when they were found IN CHRIST. Herb Evans
God knew us before we were born. Jbh28 Yes! But we did not know God before we were born. The trouble with TULIPS is they think they are God with His infinite understanding. God knew about our sin; did He plan our sin before the foundation of the world? Herb Evans
Quote:
It does not say chosen to salvation; its says chosen to be holy and unblameable. You are confused about that as well. So, to cop out and say that is what we are supposed to be, then hear this. Being saved is what we are supposed to be. Herb Evans
Quote:
what else is it talking about then. Paul is talking to Christians. This must be your "cop out" answer. Just pretend it isn't talking about election. You look too busy trying to be a anti-calvinist, that you will ignore Scripture just to be that way. Jbh28 Keep your short articles by others and write your own. I have been dealing with Calvinists for over 45 years. The first church that I joined after being saved and moved to Florida was a Calvinist church. I wrote for the Baptist Examiner, a Calvinist periodical for many years and read it for more years than that. I know what Calvinists believe. Herb Evans
Look Herb, I'm tired of playing your little game. Jbh28 Then quit playing! Herb Evans
You do not know what Calvinists really believe. Jbh28 I know what you believe, and you are a hyper extremist and fatalist. Herb Evans
you don't even know what tulip really means. Jbh28 It means fatalistic false teaching any way that you cut it. Herb Evans
You only know the straw man version of what they believe. You might have been in a Calvinist church, probably by what you have said a hyper calvinist church. Jbh28 I wrote for the leading Baptist Calvinist paper, The Baptist Examiner. All Calvinists are HYPER FALTALISTIC EXREMISTS. Herb Evans
Unless you can explain what "before the foundation of the world" means, I'm done dealing with this subject with you. You said we were elected after being saved, while Ephesians 1 says we were elected before. (unless you were born before the foundations of the world. Jbh28 I have explained it, but you do not have the intellect or the spiritual wherewithal or the proper exegesis (rather than eisegesis)to grasp it. If you want outget out! Herb Evans
Eph 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
__________________
And by the holy Scriptures we understand, the Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, as they are now translated into our English Mother-Tongue, of which there never hath been any doubt of their verity, and authority, in the protestant Churches of Christ to this day. --The English Orthodox Baptist Confession of 1679
1. Scriptures in the English mother tongue.
2. Authoritive in the English mother tongue.
3. No doubt as to their verity in the English mother tongue.
Its "regardless" irregardless isn't a word... sorry – Jbh28
Sorry, but it is a word in the dictionary – “adv [prob. Blend of irrespective and regardless] nonstand: REGARDLESS.” Still, if you want to turn a theological argument into an English or spelling argument, do it with someone else. – Herb Evans
Herb, JBH is funny. He said: “Its (sic) ‘regardless’ irregardless isn’t a word…sorry.” “Its” is a possessive pronoun. “It’s” is the contraction of “it is” or “it has.” Then he has his word in quotes (“regardless”), and then he uses your word as a real word in his sentence. If he wanted to say it correctly, he would say, “It’s ‘regardless;’ ‘irregardless’ isn’t a word.” But if all this was said before the foundation of the world, who am I to correct it? Thanks for looking the word up, and may all your Scrabble games be won by you. Regards (to gards again), -Ben
LOL! Well, he is getting a bit irritated as opposed to ritated. It is sad when a fellow tries to correct someone else's English and then ends up with egg on his face. -- Herb Scrabble Evans
__________________
And by the holy Scriptures we understand, the Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, as they are now translated into our English Mother-Tongue, of which there never hath been any doubt of their verity, and authority, in the protestant Churches of Christ to this day. --The English Orthodox Baptist Confession of 1679
1. Scriptures in the English mother tongue.
2. Authoritive in the English mother tongue.
3. No doubt as to their verity in the English mother tongue.
Its "regardless" irregardless isn't a word... sorry – Jbh28
Sorry, but it is a word in the dictionary – “adv [prob. Blend of irrespective and regardless] nonstand: REGARDLESS.” Still, if you want to turn a theological argument into an English or spelling argument, do it with someone else. – Herb Evans
Herb, JBH is funny. He said: “Its (sic) ‘regardless’ irregardless isn’t a word…sorry.” “Its” is a possessive pronoun. “It’s” is the contraction of “it is” or “it has.” Then he has his word in quotes (“regardless”), and then he uses your word as a real word in his sentence. If he wanted to say it correctly, he would say, “It’s ‘regardless;’ ‘irregardless’ isn’t a word.” But if all this was said before the foundation of the world, who am I to correct it? Thanks for looking the word up, and may all your Scrabble games be won by you. Regards (to gards again), -Ben
LOL! Well, he is getting a bit irritated as opposed to ritated. It is sad when a fellow tries to correct someone else's English and then ends up with egg on his face. -- Herb Scrabble Evans
Herb, did you not see the at the end of the sentence. The them "irregardless is incorrect" It is the dictionary, but says that it is the wrong term. Maybe I should have said it is the wrong term instead of not a word. However, I had the smile at the end. It wasn't supposed to be taken so seriously. I understnad that this is an internet forum, not an English class.
__________________
II Corinthians 1:20 ESV "For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory."
Jude 24-25 ESV "Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen."
Anyway, yes fatalism and human responsibility are opposites. They can't BOTH be in the picture. Jbh28 Okay! So, Calvinists are still fatalists. Herb Evan
How so, you can't be a fatalists and believe in human responsibility at the same time. Calvinists do no deny human responsibility.
Quote:
Actually, that is a red herring if I change the subject. A Straw man is when you misrepresent your opponents view. you know, like say P means something it doesn't and then argue against the made up view of P. --jbh28 Actually, a straw man is a weak or imaginary opposition (as an argument or adversary). How about a red herring straw man? The P in TULIP says perserverence and not preservation. Herb Evans
I thought you were saying I was changing the subject. You definition is correct.
Quote:
Nice comeback.... Was that your best? Jbh28 No, stick around for better. Herb Evans
ok
Quote:
Hyper Calvinists are those that take the doctrines of Calvinism to an extreme. you can't have "hyper" to all. doesn't make sense. Jbh28 All TULIPS take their doctrine to an extreme. Therefore, they are all hyper. Herb Evans
No they don't and you know that. This is just a lie. Not everybody takes everything to an extreme. Just because some group of "calvinists" take their doctrine to an extreme doesn't mean that all do. BTW, I have given you examples to prove this.
Quote:
Again, you are ignorant of what Calvinist believe. Not all take it to an extreme. Jbh28 Again, you are ignorant of what they believe to the extreme and even what you believe to the extreme. Herb Evans
again, I have given examples to prove what I said.
Quote:
I gave you an article from a Calvinist demonstrating the difference. But like you always do, you ignore what the Calvinist say they believe. you would rather make up something they do not believe. Jbh28 I do not ignore what you say, for you are who I am debating and not them. Again, I am not interested in Calvinist propaganda and damage control from others. It is just you and me. If you cant handle your own arguments without bringing in help pity you. Herb Evans
Ah, you want to make a claim that all Calvinists are extreme or hyper, but don't care to read what they believe. That would explain why you are ignorant of their beliefs.
Quote:
[I][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]
You keep ignoring the fact that it says before the foundation of the world. What does that mean? Jbh28 Before the foundation means eternity as in my previously posted article. Herb Evans
YES YES YES, for all eternity I have been chosen. Never a time I wasn't chosen. It has been for all eternity.
Quote:
Were you choosen when you got saved? Jbh28 Is choosen a word? Yes I was elect and chosen when I was IN CHRIST when I got saved. Herb Evans
oops, didn't catch the misspelling. I thought you just said that election was for all eternity. It doesn't say we were chosen when we were in Christ. It says we were chosen before the foundation of the world. Everything was down in Christ. That passage uses the term in Christ or in Him. Everything, including election before the foundation of the world was done in Christ. Again, you remove the "before the foundation of the world" and say the "in him" was a time. That is not what the passage says. If the "in him" refers to time, then what does "before the foundation of the world mean in that passage? What is it referencing to.
Quote:
[
I have not ignored in Christ or in Him. You are ignoring the before the foundation of the world. We were chosen in him. Jbh28 You have ignored IN HIM to be holy and blameless. You have ignored IN CHRIST as a pre requisite for that election in eternity and Gods present. Herb Evans
no I haven't.
Quote:
This doesn't mean we are already saved. Jbh28 Agreed! Herb Evans
Or already in him, . . . Jbh28 Agreed! Herb Evans
. . . we are chosen before hand in him and will be in him later. Jbh28 Chosen in Him to be Holy and without blame. Herb Evans
Yes, that is what we are supposed to be. Who are going to be holy and without blame...Christians.
Quote:
Why do you continue to ignore the "before the foundations of the world"? Jbh28 I dont ignore it, I qualify it with its own qualifier IN CHRIST. You are not IN CHRIST in eternity. Still, God has made the determination that those in Christ LATER are chosen or elect. No one is chosen or elect that does not exist. Herb Evans
That is not what the passage says. You still ignore the before the foundation of the world. How does that relate to the passage. What does that mean if the "in him" refers to when we were chosen?
__________________
II Corinthians 1:20 ESV "For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory."
Jude 24-25 ESV "Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen."
Ha, you are the one using eisegesis on the passage. I take the passage for what it says. I don't ignore any area. You have not given any explanation as to what "before the foundation of the world" means TO THAT PASSAGE. You did say it means eternity. I agreed with this, but what is the eternity referring to?
Here is my take on the verse without ignoring ANY part of the passage.
"According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him."
1. We(Christians) were chosen. "he hath chosen(past tense) us.
2. How? in Christ "chosen us in him(Christ)"
3. when? before the foundation of the world
4. purpose? to be holy and without blame before him.
__________________
II Corinthians 1:20 ESV "For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory."
Jude 24-25 ESV "Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen."
The views and opinions expressed on this web site are not necessarily those of the Fighting Fundamental Forums management. This is an open and unmoderated forum. The content of each post is the sole responsibility of the poster. Participants are expected to follow the simple rules of the forum. Within these wide parameters various views are welcome to be expressed freely.
The college names used on the FundamentalForums.com web site are trademarks of their respective schools. The forums are not officially sanctioned by any of the institutions represented.