The Fighting Fundamental Forums

Go Back   The Fighting Fundamental Forums > Fundamental Colleges > Bob Jones University



  • Christian Web Hosting
  • Christian T-Shirts
  • Advertise Here



  • Reply
     
    Thread Tools Display Modes
      #71  
    Old 08-14-2007, 06:43 PM
    CertainSound's Avatar
    CertainSound CertainSound is offline
    Like It, Love it, Gotta Have It
     
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: Near Tampa
    Posts: 5,199
    CertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond repute
    Default


    Logged In Members don't see these ads!
    Join for Free Today!
    Shall we berate "Former Funee" for evidently changing his position on fundamentals in the same way he is trying to put down BJU's change?
    __________________
    2Ti 2:24-26 the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.

    "if the trumpet give an unCertainSound what shall the righteous do?" www.CertainSound.com
    Reply With Quote
      #72  
    Old 08-15-2007, 10:36 AM
    FormerFundee FormerFundee is offline
    Warming Up
     
    Join Date: Aug 2007
    Posts: 64
    FormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to behold
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anchor View Post
    I'll bite. It is called growing. People do it all the time. There is likely not a person or organization represented on this forum that has not had some hills they would gladly die on that they later grew to realistically see in another light, nor seen some seemingly irrelevant matter that they grew to see (rightly) to be of great importance.

    Perfection is not common to man, so if we are expecting other than continuing growth in individuals and institutions in their understanding and application of truth it is to our shame. Healthy individuals and institutions grow. Your criticism should really be an accolade.
    Anchor, I'll bite. Forgive me if the quotes from Mr. Jones were so painful that you had to ignore and sugar coat them. You did as well as you could with what he gave you.

    The Bible calls the utterance of untrue statements sin, in general, and lying specifically. The invocation of God's Word to support that which the Bible does not support falls under the heading of taking the name of God in vain.

    Healthy individuals and institutions call sin "sin," make restitution where possible, and learn (grow). Had Mr. Jones III and his supporters done this I would have been one of the first to ply them with accolades.
    Reply With Quote
      #73  
    Old 08-15-2007, 10:40 AM
    Fred's Avatar
    Fred Fred is offline
    Master of Fundamentalism
     
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Posts: 818
    Fred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond repute
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FormerFundee View Post
    The Bible calls the utterance of untrue statements sin, in general, and lying specifically. The invocation of God's Word to support that which the Bible does not support falls under the heading of taking the name of God in vain.
    Please let me know your email address. I have been looking for someone who can guide me into perfection.

    BTW, does the "former" on you name mean that you haven't always been perfect?
    __________________
    Just Passing Through
    Reply With Quote
      #74  
    Old 08-15-2007, 11:04 AM
    FormerFundee FormerFundee is offline
    Warming Up
     
    Join Date: Aug 2007
    Posts: 64
    FormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to behold
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by CertainSound View Post
    Shall we berate "Former Funee" for evidently changing his position on fundamentals in the same way he is trying to put down BJU's change?
    CS, One of the "fundamentals" of the faith that I renounced was the fundamental tenet that the Joneses are immune to earthly biblical scrutiny. The fact that Mr. Jones III's words are untrue, and I dared to quote his words, does not infer that I oppose the change.

    I don't think you have any choice but to "berate" me. The alternative - focusing on Mr. Jones' untrue statements designed to deceive a worldwide audience - might deal a blow to your own fundamental beliefs.
    Reply With Quote
      #75  
    Old 08-15-2007, 11:09 AM
    FormerFundee FormerFundee is offline
    Warming Up
     
    Join Date: Aug 2007
    Posts: 64
    FormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to behold
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fred View Post
    Please let me know your email address. I have been looking for someone who can guide me into perfection.

    BTW, does the "former" on you name mean that you haven't always been perfect?
    Not until you can catch an air borne fly with chopsticks.
    Meanwhile, act like the perfect follower and ignore and berate.
    Reply With Quote
      #76  
    Old 08-15-2007, 11:20 AM
    Fred's Avatar
    Fred Fred is offline
    Master of Fundamentalism
     
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Posts: 818
    Fred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond repute
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FormerFundee View Post
    CS, One of the "fundamentals" of the faith that I renounced was the fundamental tenet that the Joneses are immune to earthly biblical scrutiny. The fact that Mr. Jones III's words are untrue, and I dared to quote his words, does not infer that I oppose the change.

    I don't think you have any choice but to "berate" me. The alternative - focusing on Mr. Jones' untrue statements designed to deceive a worldwide audience - might deal a blow to your own fundamental beliefs.
    I hope you are not under the illusion that you became less judgmental and openminded when you became an exfundie. You are full of hate that is not based on facts. It is a lie that a fundamental tenet is that the Joneses are immune to earthly biblical scrutiny. To say that Mr. Jones' statements are designed to deceive a worldwide audience is also a lie. I feel sorry for you. Hate will eat away any spiritual life you may have.

    BTW, I am not a BJUer. I don't agree with much of what the Joneses have said but I believe their beliefs were sincerely held and not some plot to deceive the world.
    __________________
    Just Passing Through
    Reply With Quote
      #77  
    Old 08-15-2007, 02:20 PM
    Mapipe Mapipe is offline
    Master of Fundamentalism
     
    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Posts: 322
    Mapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond reputeMapipe has a reputation beyond repute
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by kristensdaddy View Post
    You are right, I don't believe I ever heard pants called a sin ( at least not at BJ). I should have said pants were forbidden where men might see you (including fire drills and walking anywhere but PE).

    Doesn't change my original proposation that if I were shipped, campused, or just plain in trouble over an action that today is a non-event, I would be mad. BTW- I only got demerits for silly stuff like forgetting to clean the sink, etc.
    For crying out loud. Those rules are nothing. Where I went to school, you had to ask permission to go to the restroom after 10:30. How would you have liked to have been the hall supervisor with that rule and have a hall full of girls knocking on your door to get permission to use the john in the middle of the night.

    Rules usually look stupid until you see the reasoning. Most rules were put in force, not by the students, but because of the students' prior behavior.

    Then there was the rule that from after Sunday dinner until the walk to Sunday evening services, you weren't allowed to talk to a guy. My brother and I almost got campused when we got caught talking to each other on a Sunday afternoon. Anna Banana didn't believe we were brother and sister until we pulled out our photo ID's. Anyone out there know Anna Banana from Glide-Crawford?--course this is a Baptist Board, not a Methodist Board.

    When kids transferred back and forth from BJU to Asbury, we would play "top this" with rules. Asbury usually won, believe it or not!
    __________________
    If you had to kill it to get rid of it, then it was alive.
    Reply With Quote
      #78  
    Old 08-15-2007, 08:57 PM
    FormerFundee FormerFundee is offline
    Warming Up
     
    Join Date: Aug 2007
    Posts: 64
    FormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to beholdFormerFundee is a splendid one to behold
    Default

    Fred, you covered a great deal of ground with some wild, unsubstatiated statements, including calling me a liar. I trust that Forum members will allow me the space to defend myself.

    Fred "I hope you are not under the illusion that you became less judgmental and openminded when you became an exfundie."

    You have no factual basis for the supposition that I was "judgmental" and not "openminded" when I was a fundamentalist.

    Fred "You are full of hate that is not based on facts."

    I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say but it doesn't sound like a compliment. If you have a problem with the facts I presented - and apparently you do because you continue to ignore reality - then turn your attention to them and not to what you imagine to be wrong with me.

    Fred "It is a lie that a fundamental tenet is that the Joneses are immune to earthly biblical scrutiny."

    Had you known that blind loyalty is the coin of the realm at BJU, you would have known that "Nobody disagrees with Bob Jones and remains his friend for long." Before you accuse me of lying again, why not forward this post to Mr. Bob III and seek an answer of him? If he gives you a point-by-point answer, I'll admit this so-called "lie" of which you accuse me and publicly beg forgiveness. If he doesn't, then you admit to your own lie. Fair enough? Note this letter to a student from BJU:

    "Disloyalty is a character fault that I do not believe is ever cured. I will forgive a disloyal person if he asks me to, but I will never trust him again...[W]hen Bob Jones University has had to draw battle lines and take a position, those who are students and faculty and do not stand with us are traitors to the cause this institution represents; and there is no reason why we should ever let them return. We will forgive them if they ask us, but we could not trust them not to betray us again if the occassion arose."

    Fred "To say that Mr. Jones' statements are designed to deceive a worldwide audience is also a lie."

    Your above statement is demonstrably untrue. Dr. Walter Fremont says, "Lying is deliberately distorting reality to deceive or to mislead others by falsifying or concealing information." (Forum members, please be patient as I try to share with Fred some reality.)

    Bob Jones III convinced the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that "A primary fundamentalist conviction of [BJU] is that the Scriptures forbid interracial dating and marriage..." The Court ruled these beliefs, supported by [BJU's] interpretation of the Bible, 'are genuine religious beliefs.'"

    When he lost the tax case, Bob Jones III said, "We believe the policy that has gotten us in difficulty is a Bible policy and we're going to hold to it." Bob invoked the highest earthly authority, the Bible, the final authority for faith and practice, in support of his interracial dating/marriage ban.

    In ruling against BJU's interracial dating ban, Jones said the Supreme Court justices "have demonstrated they are enemies of heaven and the Lord Jesus Christ. I fear for America and for the court."..."The Court's ruling is an example of what is happening to religious freedom in America." In so doing, Fred, Bob publicly invoked heaven and the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Highest Authority in heaven, in support of his interracial dating/marriage ban.

    Then, Bob Jones III again found himself under national scrutiny. Everyone is well-aware that Larry King Live has a worldwide audience; that is why Bob chose Larry's show. Bob would have been foolish not to have mentally prepared "talking points." It doesn't take a media genius to identify Bob's talking points: "we've dropped the rule," "we dropped the rule," "we dropped it," "never talk about," "unimportant to us," "insignificant to us," "never talk about and it is meaningless to us," "no biblical reference," etc.

    The reality surrounding the rules would have been far less kind to BJU had Bob not distorted and/or concealed the reality surrounding the rules. The interracial rules were imposed upon every incoming student, staffer, and faculty member at BJU over many years, possibly 30,000 people, many multiple times. Each person was required to read and sign agreeing to obey the interracial rules. Students read and signed their agreement each year.

    Yet, Bob Jones III stated to a worldwide audience, "...this rule which we never talk about or preach. Which most of our students coundn't even tell you what it is. It's that unimportant to us. I said to our administration, 'You know guys, this thing is of such insignificance to us..."

    Bob Jones III said, "...this rule which we never talk about." Fred, in reality, it was regularly communicated to others. Students read and signed promising to obey the rules under threat of expulsion! Check out this 1998 letter from Jonathan Pait, BJU Community Relations Coordinator. Do you want more?

    These were not "meaningless" rules to Mr. Bob Jones III. Violation of the interracial rules led to actual expulsions and/or dismissals, as Pastors Wayne Golson and Steve Keyes found out one Monday morning when Southside Baptist Church granted memberships to a mixed race couple in their church. Incidentally, Pastor Hanford, reported from his pulpit that the interracial dating/marriage issue was, "the talk of the [BJU] chapel platform." Churches, pastors, and grads knew of the rules and the consequences of disagreements with the Joneses over such things.

    Fred "I feel sorry for you. Hate will eat away any spiritual life you may have."

    There is no honesty in these statements, Fred. They are mean-spirited and poorly disguised ad hominem attacks on me and my spiritual integrity. Get over it, Fred. Don't blame me for Bob Jones III's duplicity and your being duped.

    Fred "I don't agree with much of what the Joneses have said but I believe their beliefs were sincerely held and not some plot to deceive the world."

    You sound ridiculously like a defense attorney hopelessly saddled with a guilty pedophile or some such. Please, don't so praise me! I prefer your insults! If anyone but a Jones did that detailed herein, he would be finished as a Bible doctrine/policy guru. "Laws for all faults but faults so countenanced..."

    Yes, I was a BJU'er and I defended BJU and the Joneses. Are you having fun yet, Fred. Would you like to explain away some quotes from Bob Jr. and Bob III like this one so that we can take each saying and belief and pass them by your "sincerity" meter? After you have explained Bob's insignificant interracial dating/marriage Bible policy and how heaven and the Lord Jesus Christ support him, then you can explain this gem:

    "Bob III also inherited a gift for pugnacious rhetoric. In the '60s, he told an interviewer: 'A Negro is best when he serves at the table," then quickly added, "I'm not a racist."' The Washington Post, "Getting the Bob out of Bob Jones U".
    Reply With Quote
      #79  
    Old 08-16-2007, 08:08 AM
    Fred's Avatar
    Fred Fred is offline
    Master of Fundamentalism
     
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Posts: 818
    Fred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond reputeFred has a reputation beyond repute
    Default

    Your tome does not deminish the fact that what you have said is untrue. It is not a tenet of fundamentalism that the Joneses are immune to earthly biblical scrutiny. I have been a fundamentalist for 61 years and I think I know something about the tenets of fundamentalism. Your statement that it is a tenet makes everything else suspect.

    Your attitude that people cannot change their minds, yes even about what they considered a biblically-based principal, is petty and small-minded. Obviously, you have changed your mind about some things if you once were a fundamentalist and now you are not. Do you not allow the same things in others that you allow for yourself?

    I will not answer your rant point by point because most of them are inane and unworthy of serious consideration.

    You demonstrate each time you post that you are full of hate. Very sad.

    "Please, don't so praise me!"

    Don't worry. I won't.
    __________________
    Just Passing Through
    Reply With Quote
      #80  
    Old 08-16-2007, 08:26 AM
    CertainSound's Avatar
    CertainSound CertainSound is offline
    Like It, Love it, Gotta Have It
     
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: Near Tampa
    Posts: 5,199
    CertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond reputeCertainSound has a reputation beyond repute
    Default


    Logged In Members don't see these ads!
    Join for Free Today!
    The court case ruling was in 1983. Then about 20 years later, 1999 they changed the policy. I dare say during those years most of the students didn't discuss daily that dating rule any more than they talked about the ties on the guys before lunch rule. They just did it.

    As for the South Side Baptist Church situation: That couple joined South Side in the middle of the height of the case to get a reaction. I think that was a dirty trick by the NAACP and ACLU. The couple sure didn't attend very long.

    As for the statement you say BJ III said in the 60's, that was a typical sentiment of the bigoted south during the time. I have every confidence BJ III has grown beyond that and does not hold to those views today. You might think he is still living in the 60's but he isn't.
    __________________
    2Ti 2:24-26 the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.

    "if the trumpet give an unCertainSound what shall the righteous do?" www.CertainSound.com
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off

    Forum Jump


    All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 PM.


    The Best Baptist Web Sites at Baptist411.com  

    The Fighting Fundamental Forums is part of the Clean-Solutions.net Network

    The views and opinions expressed on this web site are not necessarily those of the Fighting Fundamental Forums management. This is an open and unmoderated forum. The content of each post is the sole responsibility of the poster. Participants are expected to follow the simple rules of the forum. Within these wide parameters various views are welcome to be expressed freely. The college names used on the FundamentalForums.com web site are trademarks of their respective schools. The forums are not officially sanctioned by any of the institutions represented.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
    Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
    Page generated in 0.08540 seconds with 11 queries